Mar 11, 2022

The Kerala Nun Rape case: Credibility of the Survivor 

TRIGGER WARNING: The following content contains information on sexual abuse that some readers may find disturbing.

 

In a recent case, the Additional Sessions Judge of Kottayam (Kerala) acquitted a high-ranking Church official from rape charges alleged against him by a nun. The nun, from the Missionaries of Jesus convent in Kuravilangad, had accused Franco Mulakkal, the Bishop of Jalandhar of raping her 13 times during his visits to the convent between 2014 and 2016. Even though there are several irregularities in this judgement, let’s focus today on the fact that the Sessions Judge discarded the testimony of the survivor in its entirety.

 

What did the Sessions Judge observe about the survivor’s testimony? 

The Sessions Judge rejected the survivor’s testimony on the ground that her claim that she was raped on 13 occasions under duress, cannot be relied on due to inconsistencies in her statement. 

 

One of the main inconsistencies the Judge pointed out was that she had failed to mention that penile penetration occurred in her First Information Statement to the police and in her statement to the doctor examining her. At that stage, she had only mentioned that the accused had inserted his fingers into her vagina, had attempted to thrust his sexual organ into her mouth and had forced her to hold his sexual organ. At a later stage, when her statement was recorded before the Judicial Magistrate, she mentioned penile penetration for the first time. The Sessions Judge held that this discrepancy was not explained by the prosecution during the trial. 

 

Why did the Sessions Judge reject the survivor’s entire testimony?

The Sessions Judge relied on a Supreme Court decision in Jayaseelan v. State of Tamil Nadu where the Court held that even if there are untruths in the statement of a witness, the court should try to separate the truth from the falsehood. However, where this separation is not feasible and in the process of separation, a completely new case has to be made, the only option is to dismiss the evidence of the witness in its entirety. Applying this, the Judge rejected the entire testimony of the survivor. 

Was the Court correct in rejecting the entire testimony of the survivor?

In the acquittal judgment, the Sessions Judge considered only a few lines from the Supreme Court’s decision in Jayaseelan, without considering other observations. In Jayaseelan, the Supreme Court distinguishes between normal discrepancies and material discrepancies in the evidence of a witness. 

 

‘Normal discrepancies’ are those which are caused by normal errors of observation, of memory due to passing of time, of mental state such as shock and horror at the time of occurrence. These discrepancies are always there however honest and truthful a witness may be. ‘Material discrepancies’ are those which are not normal and not expected of a normal person. The Supreme Court has earlier stated that while normal discrepancies do not corrode the credibility of a party’s case, material discrepancies do. An example of material discrepancy is where the witness who had given evidence before the court wants to change their mind and is prepared to speak differently at a later stage.

 

In the present case, though the survivor failed to mention penile penetration in her First Information Statement, she clarified that she had no faith in the female police officer recording her statement. This can be attributed to shock and horror, fear of what had happened to her and can only be considered a ‘normal discrepancy’. Such a discrepancy in the statement would not make the survivor’s entire statement inconsistent. 

 

In the present case, the Sessions Judge failed to make these distinctions. The Sessions Judge incorrectly rejected the survivor’s entire testimony while acquitting the Bishop. The prosecution can appeal the acquittal before the Kerala High Court on this basis.

Related Weekly Posts

March 04 2022

How does Indian law punish rape?

Trigger Warning: This explainer contains information on physical violence and sexual violence which some readers may find disturbing.   The Madhya Pradesh High Court has confirmed the death sentence as punishment for two men held guilty of gang raping an eight year old girl.   Which law punishes rape in India?   The law on […]
Read More >

March 05 2022

Is marital rape a crime in India?

Trigger Warning: This post contains information about physical and sexual abuse which some readers may find disturbing. The Gujarat High Court acquitted a man accused of raping his wife who was a minor. It stated that non-interference in the matter would be a safer option for the wife. Which law punishes rape in India? The […]
Read More >

February 26 2022

Special medical boards for abortion in rape cases: The need of the hour

Trigger Warning: This post contains information on physical violence and sexual violence which some readers may find disturbing.   The Supreme Court has asked for the Government’s response on setting up special medical boards in all districts to handle abortions for rape survivors. The Court said that a pregnant survivor should know her legal rights […]
Read More >

March 11 2022

The Kerala Nun Rape case: Credibility of the Survivor 

TRIGGER WARNING: The following content contains information on sexual abuse that some readers may find disturbing.   In a recent case, the Additional Sessions Judge of Kottayam (Kerala) acquitted a high-ranking Church official from rape charges alleged against him by a nun. The nun, from the Missionaries of Jesus convent in Kuravilangad, had accused Franco […]
Read More >

February 23 2022

100 Days of Nyaaya Daily : A Recap

Today we celebrate 100 Days of Nyaaya Daily! The Nyaaya Daily is a simple legal explainer with bite-sized, contextual information on legal issues in the news or recent legal developments. We want people to become familiar with the law and its impact on them at a personal level.  <insert video here> Here are some of […]
Read More >

February 23 2022

The violence against women continues: How does Indian law punish Rape?

Trigger Warning: This explainer contains information on physical violence and sexual violence which some readers may find disturbing.   An eight-year-old girl was thrown into a dry well after being allegedly raped and strangled to death by unidentified men in the Pratapgarh district of Rajasthan. The accused abducted the girl from her house while she […]
Read More >

March 05 2022

What are rights of rape survivors in India?

Trigger Warning: This post contains information about physical and sexual abuse which some readers may find disturbing. The Madhya Pradesh High Court has issued a show-cause notice to a trial court for disclosing the name of a rape victim in its verdict. What is rape? Rape is the crime that occurs when a man has […]
Read More >

February 26 2022

5 things the Supreme Court said about Police Reforms

The Supreme Court has said that its 2006 judgement of Prakash Singh v. Union of India, which dealt with police reforms, is used only periodically to suit the occasion, and the directions in the judgement have not been implemented seriously.   In this context, let us look at the Supreme Court’s directions in the 2006 […]
Read More >

March 06 2022

Can you file a complaint when the police harass you?

The Delhi High Court condemned the Delhi Police for conducting an illegal raid at 2.30 in the morning. It issued directions for the same. What is police harassment? Police harassment is when a police officer goes beyond their assigned duties to take advantage of a citizen in their official capacity. This can take many forms, […]
Read More >

February 26 2022

Can you get protection if you file a criminal complaint or witness a crime?

The survivor in the alleged rape case against former Karnataka Minister Ramesh Jarkiholi has written to the Karnataka High Court Chief Justice seeking protection for her life and safety. She asked the Court to take note of the threat she is facing, claiming that the Special Investigation Team (SIT) probing the case is acting in […]
Read More >

February 27 2022

Unavailability of vaccines for the 18-44 age group: What is the government going to do?

The Allahabad High Court has asked Uttar Pradesh’s Additional Chief Standing Counsel to ask the State government for instructions about the availability of Covid-19 vaccines in the State for people in the age group of 18-45 years. To know more about Covid-19 and how you can register for vaccination, read our explainer. To know more […]
Read More >

March 06 2022

Is abortion legal in India?

The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Rules, 2021 were notified by the Central Government which extended the period for getting a legal abortion from 20 to 24 weeks in certain cases. Which Indian law regulates abortions? The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, provides for the termination of certain pregnancies by authorised doctors with the […]
Read More >