The right to advertisement is protected as part of the freedom of speech. However, comparative advertisements, where two or more products are compared to bring out the advantages of the advertisers’ products, have been challenged on grounds of intellectual property and defamation.
The Delhi High Court faced a challenge to an advertisement for Complan, produced by Heinz in 2019.((Horlicks Limited v. Heinz India Private Limited, (2019) 256 DLT 468)) Horlicks Ltd. asked for an injunction on the grounds that it had unfavourably compared Heinz’s products with that of Horlicks, and had also infringed on its (Horlicks’) trademark.
The Delhi High Court observed that the comparison in the advertisement was fair, and advertisements for a product, which depicted a fair comparison with a competitive product, were permissible. It was a protected form of commercial expression under Article 19(1)(a), and could only be restricted by the limitations mentioned under Article 19(2), none of which applied to this case.
 Family & Marriage
Family & Marriage Money & Property
Money & Property Crimes & Violence
Crimes & Violence Police & Courts
Police & Courts Labour & Employment
Labour & Employment Health & Environment
Health & Environment Citizen Rights & Constitution
Citizen Rights & Constitution Government & Elections
Government & Elections Media & Intellectual Property
Media & Intellectual Property Videos
Videos Guides
Guides Sample Forms
Sample Forms Statewise Information
Statewise Information General
General Children
Children Women
Women LGBTQI+
LGBTQI+ Employees
Employees Persons with Disabilities
Persons with Disabilities Scheduled Castes & Tribes
Scheduled Castes & Tribes Senior Citizens
Senior Citizens Informal Workers
Informal Workers
 
										
 
										