Mar 11, 2022

Transferring a criminal case: The power of the Supreme Court

Earlier this year, Bollywood actress Rhea Chakraborty had asked the Supreme Court to transfer the FIR filed against her in the Sushant Singh Rajput death case. The FIR was filed by Sushant’s father at Patna. The actress wanted the Court to transfer the criminal complaint from Patna to Mumbai, where the police are already investigating Sushant’s death.

Today, the Supreme Court has refused Rhea’s request to transfer the FIR. In its judgement, the Court said that it does not have the power to transfer an investigation. The Court only has the power to transfer criminal cases and appeals.

What is the power of the Supreme Court to transfer criminal cases?

The power of the Supreme Court to transfer a criminal case is given under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The Supreme Court may transfer a particular case if it feels that this will be useful for justice. The Supreme Court has the power to transfer any criminal case from: 

  • A State High Court to another State High Court 
  • A lower level criminal court (junior to a State High Court), to another lower level criminal court (junior to another State High Court). The court to which the case is being transferred cannot be of a lower level than the original court.

In Maneka Sanjay Gandhi v. Rani Jethmalani, the Supreme Court said that having a fair trial is very important to justice, and is the main factor that the court considers when deciding whether to transfer a case. The court will not consider the convenience of a party, easy availability of legal services or other grievances while transferring the criminal case. Something substantial from the point of view of public justice is necessary for the court to exercise its power of transfer. 

Who can apply for transfer of a criminal case?

Only after an application has been made for the transfer of a case, the Supreme Court will decide whether to use its transferring power or not. The transfer application can be made by:    

  • The Attorney-General of India or Advocate-General of a State 
  • Someone who has an interest in the case. In this situation, the person has to submit the transfer application along with a written statement of the facts of the case, which can be used as legal evidence in court.

Rejecting a transfer application

The Supreme Court may dismiss the application asking for transfer of a criminal case. While denying the transfer, if the Court thinks that the transfer application was not actually genuine and not made for the right reasons, it can order the applicant to pay compensation to any person who has opposed the transfer application. The compensation paid can be up to ₹1000.

The Supreme Court judgement

In its judgement, the Supreme Court relied on the case of Ram Chander Singh Sagar v. State of Tamil Nadu. In this case, the Court had said that Section 406 does not give it the power to transfer investigations from one police station to another. A petitioner cannot approach the Supreme Court at the stage of investigation itself to directly seek an order of transfer.

Related Weekly Posts

March 02 2022

Court asks animal owners to register their animals with local authorities

The Kerala High Court has asked the State government to ensure that local authorities immediately issue public notices to animal owners to register their animals (cattle, pets etc.) with the local authority concerned, and get a licence for the animals. The Court said that current animal owners must complete the registration/licencing of animals within six […]
Read More >

March 02 2022

Court recognises the danger to women living in dowry-matrimonial homes 

The Kerala High Court, while dismissing an anticipatory bail plea, noted that ‘matrimonial homes have become the most dangerous place to live for women and the number of cases being reported in our country is alarming’.    What is dowry? Dowry is any property or valuable legal document which someone gives to the other party […]
Read More >

February 21 2022

5 important things that the Supreme Court recently said about the Law on Maintenance

The Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement in the case of Rajnesh v. Neha, discussing various aspects of the law on maintenance in India. Here are 5 notable points from the judgement. Claiming maintenance under multiple laws  The following Indian laws provide for maintenance: a) Special Marriage Act, 1954 (SMA) – Sections 36 and 37 […]
Read More >

February 26 2022

5 things the Supreme Court said about Police Reforms

The Supreme Court has said that its 2006 judgement of Prakash Singh v. Union of India, which dealt with police reforms, is used only periodically to suit the occasion, and the directions in the judgement have not been implemented seriously.   In this context, let us look at the Supreme Court’s directions in the 2006 […]
Read More >

February 24 2022

Addressing Sexual Harassment within the Supreme Court

Trigger Warning: This post contains information on physical violence and sexual violence which some readers may find disturbing.   The Gender Sensitisation and Internal Complaints Committee (GSICC) of the Supreme Court has found Ashok Saini, the clerk of an advocate, guilty of sexual harassment within Court premises. Saini has been debarred from entering the Court […]
Read More >

February 27 2022

Advocates boycotting the court – Wrong at so many levels?

After Karnataka bar associations asked their members to stop doing court work, the Karnataka High Court has ordered them to give an undertaking saying that they will follow the law, which holds that it is illegal for advocates to boycott the court. The Court said that till then, it will not drop its contempt proceedings […]
Read More >

February 28 2022

Covid-19 update: Court emphasises on importance of erecting cell phone towers

The Madras High Court has noted that during the prevailing Covid-19 pandemic, students are being taught only through online education, and official meetings and even court proceedings are being held through video conferencing. Hence, the Court held that it is necessary to expand information and communication technology networks, including installation and erection of cell phone […]
Read More >

February 28 2022

Covid-19 update: Court says fix the price for transporting oxygen

The Kerala High Court has asked the State government to speed up the process for fixing the transportation cost of Liquid Medical Oxygen and Oxygen Inhalation (Medicinal Gas) in cylinders. The Court said that the price of oxygen can be controlled effectively only if the transportation cost charged by the manufacturer/supplier is fixed.   To […]
Read More >

February 28 2022

Covid-19 update: Court says people cannot wait indefinitely for second dose of Covid-19 vaccine

The Tripura High Court has said that people who have already received their first dose of the Covid-19 vaccine cannot wait indefinitely for receiving the second dose after the mandatory waiting period is over. The Court noted that they would qualify for administration of a second dose upon completion of 12 weeks or 4 weeks […]
Read More >

February 24 2022

Did you Know not obeying a Court order can land you in jail?

The Madras High Court has held the Church of South India Madras Diocese Bishop and two pastors guilty of contempt of court for not following its order. The High Court sentenced them to imprisonment for three months with a fine of Rupees 1,500 each.   Contempt of court simply means disrespecting the court in any […]
Read More >

February 24 2022

Did you know: 65% of the death sentences imposed by courts in 2020 were for offences involving sexual violence

Trigger Warning: This post contains information on physical violence and sexual violence which some readers may find disturbing.   This statistic comes from the fifth edition of the Death Penalty in India: Annual Statistics Report, published by Project 39A at National Law University, Delhi. The Report provides an update on all death penalty cases in […]
Read More >

March 04 2022

Did you know: A High Court cannot set aside an FIR if there are serious accusations in the criminal complaint

The Supreme Court has confirmed that when there are serious triable allegations in a criminal complaint, a High Court should not use its power to set aside an FIR under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.   What should a High Court consider to set aside an FIR? High Courts have the […]
Read More >

March 04 2022

Did you know: Making a fair criticism of a judgement is not contempt of court

The Calcutta High Court has said that fair and legitimate criticism of a judgment in a healthy way is always welcome. However, the Court added that if this is done maliciously without any real foundation, the court should take strict action against the concerned person for hampering the judicial system and fairness and impartiality of […]
Read More >

March 04 2022

Do you want to settle your pending court case? Why not approach a Lok Adalat?

Recently, National Lok Adalats held in 33 States and Union Territories significantly eased the pressure on the judicial system by settling over 15 lakh of more than 33 lakh pending and pre-litigation cases, and awarding a total amount of around Rs 2,281 crore. Let us look at the significance of Lok Adalats in India.   […]
Read More >